The Master
Limited Partnerships Parity Act (MLPPA), which would put some renewable energy
investments on the same tax footing as is now enjoyed by their
fossil-fuel counterparts, may be passed in a compromise that would see the end
of tax incentive programs that are essential to the functioning of today’s
renewable energy financing system.
According to
energy expert Robert Rapier, writing here on July 21, 2015:
“The Senate
version of the MLPPA has been referred to that chamber’s Committee on Finance,
while the House version was referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Allowing the current tax credits to expire at the end of 2016 while providing
MLP status for renewable energy projects might be a compromise reluctant
Republicans could stomach. If so, then the third time may be the charm for the
MLPPA.”
The “current
tax credits” referred to by Rapier are the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) and the
Production Tax Credit (PTC), both of which currently play important roles in
making renewable energy projects economically- and financially-viable.
Those now
benefiting from such programs and those hoping to benefit from them in the future
might be expected to oppose their phasing-out at the end of 2016 under this
hypothetical compromise.
Under the
terms of the MLPPA, revenues derived from renewable sources would become “qualifying
income” under the terms of the Internal Revenue Code. This would allow renewables-based Master
Limited Partnerships to float IPOs and pass on their profits to investors
without first paying federal corporate income tax.
For more
about the MLPPA, you can read “The Master Limited Partnerships Parity Act: Friend or Foe?”, by Sonia J. Toson at
Kennesaw State University, here.
For even more
about what “qualifying income” is, look at this article penned by three
attorneys at the international law firm Norton Rose Fulbright, here.
The House
version of the pending MLPPA is H.R. 2883. It currently resides in the Tax
Policy Subcommittee of the House Ways & Means Committee, which is chaired
by Representative Charles W. Boustany, Jr., MD. The Senate version is S. 1656.
Some of the
same benefits available from Master Limited Partnerships are already accruing
to renewables investors through the use of the “yield co.” This financial construct, should it grow in popularity, could conceivably
obviate the need for the MLPPA entirely, allowing the ITC and PTC to remain in
place, if Congress can be persuaded to extend them past the end of this year.
No comments:
Post a Comment